Category Archives: Historical References
Here are two parts of Obama’s speech in Kansas, on December 6th.
~ Let us start by defining “New Nationalism“…… It was first introduced by Theodore Roosevelt on August 31, 1910. As a Progressive ideal, it was one (if not THE) first to propose Government-subsidies for healthcare, poverty, unemployment, Social Security, and other issues which increase the government size. It worked on union principles, pushing for minimum wage, taxation on businesses, and an increased regulation on the Railroad industry which was expanding at the time – in ordered to help the farmers, who had to pay to ship their products to market…
~ A brief paragraph from Obama’s speech ~
“Now, it’s [the free market] a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to
our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much
government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a
bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It
has never worked. (Applause.) It didn’t work when it was tried in the
decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible
postwar booms of the ‘50s and ‘60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it
during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, it’s not as if
we haven’t tried this theory”.
~ So Obama is saying that one of the greatest economic systems to ever come to existence is a PROBLEM? So when the Great Depression continued on because of Governmental intervention and growth, it was the free market that led to this continued downturn? So when soldiers naturally came back to America after the War to spend their money in our domestic economy, which bolstered a vast manufacturing boom, it was NOT because of the market trends of the time? Finally, it is because of the Free Market that we have to increase taxes and support the many government programs in existence, RIGHT?!
…… It is flooring how the many supporters of Obama put up with this… I know that there are the Communists, the Marxists, the Occupy people, Hippies, College students… but REALLY?
A look into part of the Astrology behind Barack Hussein Obama II……
Obama’s Part of Commerce
Obama’s Part of Commerce is 00LEO11′ and in the 12th house. It is opposed his Grand – Conjunction in the 6th house, representing point of demise (Saturn) and point of expansion (Jupiter). These lines of algebraic compilation are a part of a schemata attributed to bored Arabs who pushed astrological knowledge by ingenuity and by curiosity. To calculate the point of commerce, there are a few ways. One way is to place the Sun on the ascendant and there where the Mercury lies will be the degree and sign of the part of commerce.
The first thing we note is that it is in the twelfth house, and at a 150 degree position from its home sign of Virgo. So there is tension already in the way Obama seeks to understand commerce. Next, being the karmic sign and sanguine – in the 12th house, this is part of Obama’s lesson in life. There are no harmonic aspects to Mercury in Obama’s chart, there is however three strong negative alignments to his Mercury. First is Mercury as the part of commerce is opposed to Jupiter in the sixth house. This tells us that the native tends to gloss over contracts and legal documents. The native also ignores details that does not fit his preconceived economic ideology. This negative tension ‘can’ create economic disasters as a result. Since Jupiter is the strongest of the two opposing planets, the other being Saturn, it is the strongest. Jupiter in a natives chart as a part of Expansion ( so general that the sign and degrees must be applied) amplifies the negative part of Mercury because of the opposition.
The next position we look at is the part of Saturn, or part of demise. Mercury is also opposing this planet from the twelfth and Saturn lay in the sixth house. Thus, this part of commerce aspects which is negative again pertains to individuals who are suspicious of how commerce works. This tends toward rash actions, because Mercury is in Leo a fire – sign. This aspect to Saturn also breeds a cunning (liar) as part of the symbolism of the snake ( oil-salesman) in the garden of Eden. Thus these native tend to sell a family a-bill-of-goods. These types of commerce aspects show up in the traveling swindler. Finally, this aspect to Saturn from the part of commerce makes a native a partisan and owns a narrow mind.
The influences of the 12/6 axis and the part of commerce pertains to services, social issues, including slaves, bondage, incarceration, corporations who use economic slave – labor, and medical, health, and nutrition issues. Saturn as the cusp indicates a certain amount of ‘hidden’ injuries as a general concept that are difficult to diagnose.
Both Saturn and Jupiter are retrograde in the horoscope of Obama. Many expert astrologers who say the world implications and momentum of an African heading up the U.S.A. did not want to analyze the horoscope for Obama – thus they may lose customers who idolize his otherwise messiah-complex.
When Obama’s Sun rose over Mombassa, where he was born, Algol culminated with his Moon. This made Algol the Part of Fortune for Obama. The passion Algol gives-out is anti-herocial and therefore the passion to bring mediocrity is expressed as a powerful emotion to the native.
Obama has a supergrand – trine to his Algolian Moon and M.C. using the ancient system of Helical rising charts, known to be used in the ancient times, as well as some of the medieval times, because birth times were not usually known of leaders who did not broadcast them – nor were their archives or newspapers to access these informations. Algol prominent in Obama’s chart assures him he will have a portion of the population that will live-and-die breathing his causes and agendas.
Obama’s natal square to his part of commerce indicates complete or frustrated ignorance to how economies work. A decent lesson would be to return to school and read some diverse historians, such as a great Chinese historian, where one will find they commented that when the bureaucracy became to large, it became entangled and the economy suffered so the leaders, or new leaders gave back to the individuals their rights to own their own businesses and make decisions for themselves. This spurred on the economy until it recovered where the Chinese like clockwork, again bureaucratized the economy until it again at some future point in time stagnated. When the Democratic Party overwhelmingly defeated the republicans in both the house and the Senate and passed bills to pay-off banks, their special interest groups, their constituents, like the unions, the U.S.A. Economy began to falter because of this Chinese lesson of entanglement and bureaucratizing.
For those proficient in Western Astrology, Here is Obama’s Astrological Chart.
My family has been in California for nearly a century – and we are preparing to move by next year. California has seen a great rise in this period, with its growth in the World Wars exploding as it became a gateway to and from the United States. It became an industrial giant, the world’s port, the center of international entertainment, an agricultural heaven…… now it is has the highest taxation in the United States under New York, the center of over-regulation of businesses, a haven for Illegal aliens and Democrat voting blocks, and the target of deficit-inducing legislation.
This article below, found by a friend of mine, further discusses California’s downfall – and how a second term under Obama (which shall hopefully not come) will lead to a downfall of greater proportions than that of California.
Obviously the numbers and issues differ…… but Reagan faces the issues of government regulation of industries, welfare spending, government special interest programs, and many more issues – and he places the individual as the priority.Very applicable to today’s world……
I really hate 9/11 Conspiracy theorists…… they cannot explain everything, and yet they continually hack at facts that cannot be proven, disproven, or are just nonexistent.
In any case, this article below gives new insight on the mechanisms behind the Twin Towers’ collapse. Very interesting.
This day, 10 years ago, America lived through one of the darkest days in modern history. 4 passenger jets crashed by the force of terrorism. The twin world trade centers were each hit with planes, a third into the Pentagon. A fourth plane never reached its destination, it was brought down by the brave souls on flight 93 that made the ultimate sacrifice. Almost 3,000 innocent people were killed that day, along with the first responders to the attacks as firemen, police, and paramedics…… there is much people may do to commemorate those who died, risked their lives, and continue to do so overseas today.
I have personally done my part, giving my respects and rewatching the events of 9/11. I barely remember that day, only in second grade and not affected by the realities of the world. I am now beginning to truly understand the implications of the attack, and of that day. I share the grief and the hopes of many victims, and support those who also commemorate 9/11.
I cannot say the same for others. One of my….. acquaintances, posted this on Facebook:
“3,000 people killed in two towers, and a nation reacts with a never ending war. 300,000+ Middle Eastern civilians killed so far in the War on Terrorism, and no one says a word. Guantanamo is still open, and the government’s listening to your telephone. We can’t even take nail clippers on an airplane. What everyone else has forgotten or ignores, I will not forget. 9/11 was a tragedy, but don’t forget the rest of the picture, or the terrorists really do win.”
I am no longer acquaintances with him. He truly could not care less about current events, he is liberal… during the elections for California governor, he told me he was for Fiorina and Brown and he could not state why he was for these opposites. He not only does not think for himself, but he cannot form a coherent argument. He has the ability to insult many people with his lack of concern.
In other parts of the world, for example the Islamic European continent, a militant religion has overruled the English government and burnt the American flag during a declared moment of silence. This has caused the spineless government to stop civilians from honoring those who died on 9/11, and stop them from placing wreaths, and having ceremonies. It is disgraceful for a government to stoop to those who threatened freedom, and who continue to do so in that said government’s country. But that is for a different day….
After hours at the Animatronic Hall of Presidents, the robotic Obama has an interesting debate with a robotic Reagan. And the sparks fly. Literally.
This three-part series played last night and will hopefully be playing throughout the next few weeks… it brings to light how Americans have worked for building our future while remembering the past. The series goes over the construction of the buildings themselves, recounts many peoples’ personal connection to Ground Zero, and emphasizes the messages and drive behind the buildings’ renewal. PLEASE be sure to watch it sometime soon.
To view the article with quotes from Rick Perry, click here.
Rick Perry has experience from being the governor of Texas, allowing for great economic expansion in the midst of recession. With his running in the presidential election of 2012, his views are being renewed and manipulated as he campaigns to a wide range of groups. I see him as a right-wing person who may finally place the government back in conservative hands… but does the news of his altering Constitutional amendments change my perspective? Here are the seven ways Perry is thinking of altering in the Constitution.
1. Abolish lifetime tenure for federal judges by amending Article III, Section I of the Constitution.
This is a conservative choice. The controversy over the choosing Chief Justice Sonia Sotomayor brought this issue to light, as her views of being prejudiced and making liberal court decisions angered many people. This is a harder issue, for it depends upon the time period situation and the president who chooses the federal judges. Many court decisions including Roe v. Wade, Brown v. Board of Education, and Miranda v. Arizona would not have come out as they did because of the values the court justices held.
The point of the Supreme Court is to have people free from the prejudices and influences that other branches are afflicted by. Were we to abolish lifetime appointment and change it to a shorter, regular interval, justices would be influenced to side with the president or select factions that keep them in their position. Without lifetime appointment, the law would not be blind.
2. Congress should have the power to override Supreme Court decisions with a two-thirds vote.
This would also influence the supreme justices for the worse, as they would have to reach compromise with yet another party. Not only would Congress continue to be sidetracked, but they would waste time upon arguing a Supreme Court case among themselves and further distorting it.
3. Scrap the federal income tax by repealing the Sixteenth Amendment.
I personally hate taxes. Congress’s spending of taxpayer money is not helping this issue. I support the scraping of the federal income tax, as it is not directed towards any one state or area that may need support more so than any other group. Federal income tax is also the highest of taxes in the United States.
4. End the direct election of senators by repealing the Seventeenth Amendment.
I am not sure whether or not this is conservative. If the people directly vote for their senators, then they may be influenced by campaigning efforts and the media. Although this gives Americans direct representation, it allows for conflicting values to develop between the elected senator and lower representatives. I do support this course of action, as it will make Americans and their lower representatives to both be accountable for their votes and allow for unified action among government officials.
5. Require the federal government to balance its budget every year.
This is the most reasonable course of action, and it is the most likely to be passed. A balanced budget is supposed to have less spending, and greater GDP than interest rates and debt increases. This has gained the most momentum due to the current administration’s spending craze and push to increase the debt ceiling.
6. The federal Constitution should define marriage as between one man and one woman in all 50 states.
I see this as violating the pursuit of happiness. The government should have no right to violate the love two people have for each other, regardless of either’s gender. I do not want to see two men or two women making out in public, but they do have the right to a domestic partnership and a happy relationship.
7. Abortion should be made illegal throughout the country.
It is unfortunate to see young children and teenagers going through such troubled times, and not having the resources or knowledge to care for a child. However, we should not abandon an option that allows a person such freedom from a past of violence. We can resolve this issue with better education and accessibility to centers that may care for victims. There needs to be more openness on the issue of sex and crime, and this will lead to greater knowledge in the event of such an issue. Technology might allow for earlier warning of pregnancy, and stem cell research may not be as slandered. I should personally hope that people would find ways to make having a child worth it, but I respect a person’s need to care for themselves and their situation.
Overall, I do not support Rick Perry’s support of changing the Constitution. It is mainly through the exploration of morals, values and purpose that guide such a conclusion. If you do not know your position on issues, than find out where you stand on the political spectrum and go from there. Hopefully, by doing so, you may reach your own conclusions on issues like this.
It is the 32nd Anniversary of the Malaise speech. Listen to Obama duplicate the rhetoric of Jimmy Carter’s malaise speech. He agrees with the same principles… that American consumerism that drives the economy is bad. That everyone who has possessions should simply give them away, and be gone from them. That anyone who has any money left in such times should ‘sacrifice’ what they have. The list goes on and on…