Category Archives: american politics

Should Herman Cain have Stayed in the Presidential Election?

“A Time for Choosing” Ronald Reagan Speech Applicable TODAY

Obviously the numbers and issues differ…… but Reagan faces the issues of government regulation of industries, welfare spending, government special interest programs, and many more issues – and he places the individual as the priority.Very applicable to today’s world……

AMERICAN JOBS BILL TEXT

http://www.scribd.com/doc/64724486/American-Jobs-Act-Final

The American Jobs Bill Text has finally come out! $450 billion taxpayer dollars, and 155 Pages of who knows what… don’t think that Congress wanted to read it, and that they might just “Pass it right away”, or “Right now”. READ IT

Presidential Brawl

After hours at the Animatronic Hall of Presidents, the robotic Obama has an interesting debate with a robotic Reagan. And the sparks fly. Literally.

Rick Perry and Constitution Changes?

To view the article with quotes from Rick Perry, click here.

Rick Perry has experience from being the governor of Texas, allowing for great economic expansion in the midst of recession. With his running in the presidential election of 2012, his views are being renewed and manipulated as he campaigns to a wide range of groups. I see him as a right-wing person who may finally place the government back in conservative hands… but does the news of his altering Constitutional amendments change my perspective? Here are the seven ways Perry is thinking of altering in the Constitution.

1. Abolish lifetime tenure for federal judges by amending Article III, Section I of the Constitution.

This is a conservative choice. The controversy over the choosing Chief Justice Sonia Sotomayor brought this issue to light, as her views of being prejudiced and making liberal court decisions angered many people. This is a harder issue, for it depends upon the time period situation and the president who chooses the federal judges. Many court decisions including Roe v. Wade, Brown v. Board of Education, and Miranda v. Arizona would not have come out as they did because of the values the court justices held.

The point of the Supreme Court is to have people free from the prejudices and influences that other branches are afflicted by. Were we to abolish lifetime appointment and change it to a shorter, regular interval, justices would be influenced to side with the president or select factions that keep them in their position. Without lifetime appointment, the law would not be blind.

2. Congress should have the power to override Supreme Court decisions with a two-thirds vote.

This would also influence the supreme justices for the worse, as they would have to reach compromise with yet another party. Not only would Congress continue to be sidetracked, but they would waste time upon arguing a Supreme Court case among themselves and further distorting it.

3. Scrap the federal income tax by repealing the Sixteenth Amendment.

I personally hate taxes. Congress’s spending of taxpayer money is not helping this issue. I support the scraping of the federal income tax, as it is not directed towards any one state or area that may need support more so than any other group. Federal income tax is also the highest of taxes in the United States.

4. End the direct election of senators by repealing the Seventeenth Amendment.

I am not sure whether or not this is conservative. If the people directly vote for their senators, then they may be influenced by campaigning efforts and the media. Although this gives Americans direct representation, it allows for conflicting values to develop between the elected senator and lower representatives.  I do support this course of action, as it will make Americans and their lower representatives to both be accountable for their votes and allow for unified action among government officials.

5. Require the federal government to balance its budget every year.

This is the most reasonable course of action, and it is the most likely to be passed. A balanced budget is supposed to have less spending, and greater GDP than interest rates and debt increases. This has gained the most momentum due to the current administration’s spending craze and push to increase the debt ceiling.

6. The federal Constitution should define marriage as between one man and one woman in all 50 states.

I see this as violating the pursuit of happiness. The government should have no right to violate the love two people have for each other, regardless of either’s gender. I do not want to see two men or two women making out in public, but they do have the right to a domestic partnership and a happy relationship.

7. Abortion should be made illegal throughout the country.

It is unfortunate to see young children and teenagers going through such troubled times, and not having the resources or knowledge to care for a child. However, we should not abandon an option that allows a person such freedom from a past of violence. We can resolve this issue with better education and accessibility to centers that may care for victims. There needs to be more openness on the issue of sex and crime, and this will lead to greater knowledge in the event of such an issue. Technology might allow for earlier warning of pregnancy, and stem cell research may not be as slandered. I should personally hope that people would find ways to make having a child worth it, but I respect a person’s need to care for themselves and their situation.

__________________________________________________________________________

Overall, I do not support Rick Perry’s support of changing the Constitution. It is mainly through the exploration of morals, values and purpose that guide such a conclusion. If you do not know your position on issues, than find out where you stand on the political spectrum and go from there. Hopefully, by doing so, you may reach your own conclusions on issues like this.

Arguing from a Point of View

I am right now feeling a bit tired, but I wish to explain something for people who keep preaching for higher equality among people from rich to poor, black to white, all of that jazz…….

“So long as there are any differences, be them obvious or subtle, then there will be room for opposition and fuel for arguing against an opposing view.”

It is a part of humanity’s nature to strive for excellence, in moral character or in social standards. This drive is different for all people, each with different resources and backgrounds. Resulting from innate differences comes a variety of results; a poor man who came to be from economic collapse, or one who was never motivated… a rich man who worked to the top, and the rich who inherited success…… all of these people will argue for their own positions to gain success.

The Founding Fathers themselves were progressive for their time. They did not easily believe in free slaves, due to economic biases. They could not see women in an equal light; we still do not today, to an extent… However, they understood that among society differences in opinion would lead to misrepresentation. This misrepresentation can be created through migration to cities in the early 20th century, desperation for success in the Great Depression, or a lack of common sense as we now have……

The world will never be perfect, and so humanity shall never be equal. This, by the way, is why socialism and communism never work. Until we are either technologically ready or economically prepared for it, we shall maintain our innate differences.